<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iron Man (2008)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/</link>
	<description>Watch Movies Online On Demand For Free Full Movie Free Movies Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:27:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Iron Man 2&#8242; Was a Mistake?</title>
		<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/#comment-10870</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Iron Man 2&#8242; Was a Mistake?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10870</guid>
		<description>[...] follow-up to the famed “Iron Man” film has its pros and cons. Despite the heavyweight buzz and sales generated by “Iron Man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] follow-up to the famed “Iron Man” film has its pros and cons. Despite the heavyweight buzz and sales generated by “Iron Man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New &#8216;Iron Man 2&#8242; Trailer with War Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/#comment-7348</link>
		<dc:creator>New &#8216;Iron Man 2&#8242; Trailer with War Machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7348</guid>
		<description>[...] suffering from too much villains involved, the number of major players in the upcoming “Iron Man” sequel draws significant concern. Director Jon Favreau has his hands full with the Black Widow, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suffering from too much villains involved, the number of major players in the upcoming “Iron Man” sequel draws significant concern. Director Jon Favreau has his hands full with the Black Widow, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor Boiar (iboiar@hotmail.com)</title>
		<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Boiar (iboiar@hotmail.com)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>The curtain rises on Marvel Comics&#039; first in-house production torousing results as their metal man of iron introduces himself toenthralled moviegoers everywhere. Just as billionaire playboy TonyStark utilizes his technological know-how to fight evildoers, so doesdirector Jon Favreau use his bag of cinematic tricks to lay thegroundwork for yet another top-caliber franchise starring one of thebiggest icons of the printed page. Delivering laughs as well as leapsof wonder, this comic-book fantasy gets it right across the board, withits buoyant tone never diluting the grounded dramatics of the story.For the flick to work, though, one needs an exceptional cast --something this production has in spades. Sure, it&#039;s an origin story,but to the cast&#039;s credit, none of it ever seems tedious. Even if theybasically follow the same superhero mold of yesteryear, the tightensemble of Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Terrence Howard, andJeff Bridges sells the action romp every step of the way -- so much sothat one can&#039;t help but want more. It&#039;s quite evident that the best isyet to come, not only with this series, but also with big-screen Marveloutings as a whole. With clever shout-outs to the imprint&#039;s expansiveuniverse (including a post-credit cameo that&#039;ll send the geek Richterscale off the charts), Iron Man sets the stage for as yet unrealizedcrossover possibilities, a dream barely hinted at in previousbook-to-screen adaptations. If future productions can deliver on thestory while juggling both the technology and the talent as well as thisone did, then it is possible that this is the true start of comicdom&#039;scinematic rebirth, built by the best that Hollywood has to offer. Allin all, a fine introduction to a hero that finally dares to tackleweight-of-the-world issues. It&#039;s about time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curtain rises on Marvel Comics&#x27; first in-house production torousing results as their metal man of iron introduces himself toenthralled moviegoers everywhere. Just as billionaire playboy TonyStark utilizes his technological know-how to fight evildoers, so doesdirector Jon Favreau use his bag of cinematic tricks to lay thegroundwork for yet another top-caliber franchise starring one of thebiggest icons of the printed page. Delivering laughs as well as leapsof wonder, this comic-book fantasy gets it right across the board, withits buoyant tone never diluting the grounded dramatics of the story.For the flick to work, though, one needs an exceptional cast &#8211;something this production has in spades. Sure, it&#x27;s an origin story,but to the cast&#x27;s credit, none of it ever seems tedious. Even if theybasically follow the same superhero mold of yesteryear, the tightensemble of Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Terrence Howard, andJeff Bridges sells the action romp every step of the way &#8212; so much sothat one can&#x27;t help but want more. It&#x27;s quite evident that the best isyet to come, not only with this series, but also with big-screen Marveloutings as a whole. With clever shout-outs to the imprint&#x27;s expansiveuniverse (including a post-credit cameo that&#x27;ll send the geek Richterscale off the charts), Iron Man sets the stage for as yet unrealizedcrossover possibilities, a dream barely hinted at in previousbook-to-screen adaptations. If future productions can deliver on thestory while juggling both the technology and the talent as well as thisone did, then it is possible that this is the true start of comicdom&#x27;scinematic rebirth, built by the best that Hollywood has to offer. Allin all, a fine introduction to a hero that finally dares to tackleweight-of-the-world issues. It&#x27;s about time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siderite</title>
		<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>siderite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>OK, it&#039;s a comic book movie. I got that. Also, they are Marvel comics,so Ari Arad has something to do with it and the main goal is not acinematic masterpiece. I am also unfamiliar with the comics themselves.So I didn&#039;t watch this movie with high expectations, not at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And still, it bored the hell out of me. Terrorists kidnap the mostbrilliant weapon manufacturer in the world? He escapes by building arobotic suit instead of the missile the terrorists wanted him to build?And the suit is powered by a battery that he just happened to createwhile in captivity? Was that the plot of the comic? Because usuallyeven the worst comics have a plot!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And then the casting. I like Robert Downey, even if he hasn&#039;t acted inanything decent lately. Jeff Bridges? A favourite of mine. GwynethPaltrow, yummy! I even like Terrence Howard. And what did they achieve?Absolutely nothing! NOTHING! Not that they played badly, but they justcouldn&#039;t do anything within the script!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What else is there to talk about? The special effects? Some flashylights and then lots of explosions. Oh, and a flying robotic suit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bottom line: lousy story to begin with, but scripted even worse. Avoid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it&#x27;s a comic book movie. I got that. Also, they are Marvel comics,so Ari Arad has something to do with it and the main goal is not acinematic masterpiece. I am also unfamiliar with the comics themselves.So I didn&#x27;t watch this movie with high expectations, not at all.</p>
<p>And still, it bored the hell out of me. Terrorists kidnap the mostbrilliant weapon manufacturer in the world? He escapes by building arobotic suit instead of the missile the terrorists wanted him to build?And the suit is powered by a battery that he just happened to createwhile in captivity? Was that the plot of the comic? Because usuallyeven the worst comics have a plot!</p>
<p>And then the casting. I like Robert Downey, even if he hasn&#x27;t acted inanything decent lately. Jeff Bridges? A favourite of mine. GwynethPaltrow, yummy! I even like Terrence Howard. And what did they achieve?Absolutely nothing! NOTHING! Not that they played badly, but they justcouldn&#x27;t do anything within the script!</p>
<p>What else is there to talk about? The special effects? Some flashylights and then lots of explosions. Oh, and a flying robotic suit.</p>
<p>Bottom line: lousy story to begin with, but scripted even worse. Avoid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UncleLongHair2</title>
		<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>UncleLongHair2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>I must be out of touch with modern pop culture because I have no ideahow people can spend 2 hours watching movies like this, and the floodof top ratings and positive reviews on this site make this all the moremysterious. I was even more surprised that several friends andneighbors highly recommended the movie. So, my curiosity piqued, Iwatched it. Perhaps this negative bias overly influenced my reaction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe it would have helped if I had been an avid fan of the comic book-- that seems to be necessary to accept the absurd back story. But Ifound the plot, story, characters, and cinematography to be unbearablypredictable and far-fetched. I realize the movie is supposed to providesome indulgent escapism. But setting it in Afghanistan ruined this forme, which forced me to think about the terrible realities there.Setting it in a fictitious city like Gotham would have helped.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Iron Man has a lot in common with Spiderman (not to mention the longlist of formula superhero adaptations before it), but I enjoyed thatmovie much more, as it had a much more plausible human side, and ahumble super hero main character is much more palatable to me than thesmarmy Robert Downey Jr. who acted like he needed a good paddling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite a lot of dozing off and eye-rolling, the highlight in the moviefor me was Gwyneth Paltrow, who is not only cute but did a marvelousjob of acting the conflicted role of Stark&#039;s better half, and somehowdidn&#039;t look ridiculous walking over piles of broken glass in 4 inchheels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps it is a comment on our culture that enormous sums of money arespent making and watching movies like this? Do we truly have nothingbetter to do with our collective time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be out of touch with modern pop culture because I have no ideahow people can spend 2 hours watching movies like this, and the floodof top ratings and positive reviews on this site make this all the moremysterious. I was even more surprised that several friends andneighbors highly recommended the movie. So, my curiosity piqued, Iwatched it. Perhaps this negative bias overly influenced my reaction.</p>
<p>Maybe it would have helped if I had been an avid fan of the comic book&#8211; that seems to be necessary to accept the absurd back story. But Ifound the plot, story, characters, and cinematography to be unbearablypredictable and far-fetched. I realize the movie is supposed to providesome indulgent escapism. But setting it in Afghanistan ruined this forme, which forced me to think about the terrible realities there.Setting it in a fictitious city like Gotham would have helped.</p>
<p>Iron Man has a lot in common with Spiderman (not to mention the longlist of formula superhero adaptations before it), but I enjoyed thatmovie much more, as it had a much more plausible human side, and ahumble super hero main character is much more palatable to me than thesmarmy Robert Downey Jr. who acted like he needed a good paddling.</p>
<p>Despite a lot of dozing off and eye-rolling, the highlight in the moviefor me was Gwyneth Paltrow, who is not only cute but did a marvelousjob of acting the conflicted role of Stark&#x27;s better half, and somehowdidn&#x27;t look ridiculous walking over piles of broken glass in 4 inchheels.</p>
<p>Perhaps it is a comment on our culture that enormous sums of money arespent making and watching movies like this? Do we truly have nothingbetter to do with our collective time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Carpet</title>
		<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Carpet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>Iron Man is a remake of the bizarre and pointless Australian filmTesti: Iron Man. That film was black and white and messed up. Americadoesn&#039;t like that sort of thing (neither do me) so they decided to turnit into an excitement film instead. Interestingly though, neither filmfeatures any appearances from any Black Sabbath member. There couldhave been a fight between Iron Man and Tony Iommi, or Ozzy could havebeen supplying Robin Downy Jr with drugs and liquor, but maybe thenthis wouldn&#039;t have received the U rating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The film is a rip off of Batman- a billionaire playboy who is worthmillions, I can&#039;t remember his name, likes to build robots and sellthem to bad guys in places like Egypt. He is bored with his life andfancies a change so he turns himself into a half man half machine halfbird creature, and calls himself Iron Man. After his parents aremurdered he realises his purpose is revenge. He covers his body in thelatest weaponry- guns, lasers, big knifes, and learns to fly. After abrief training montage (running up hills, lifting cars, shootingtargets showing his skill and fitness progress) he flies to a terroristcountry and kills the bad guys. That&#039;s about it really. Quite shallow,but some good actions and graphics. I don&#039;t think anyone else famouswas in the movie though I was pretty drunk on whiskey while watchingit. I think it was an attempt to start a new franchise so maybe morethings will happen in the next film. The Man Of Steel will return to acinema near you next year or two! Best Scene: When Iron Man is learningto fly and he keeps zooming into the ceiling of his barn and whackinghis head. What a chump!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iron Man is a remake of the bizarre and pointless Australian filmTesti: Iron Man. That film was black and white and messed up. Americadoesn&#x27;t like that sort of thing (neither do me) so they decided to turnit into an excitement film instead. Interestingly though, neither filmfeatures any appearances from any Black Sabbath member. There couldhave been a fight between Iron Man and Tony Iommi, or Ozzy could havebeen supplying Robin Downy Jr with drugs and liquor, but maybe thenthis wouldn&#x27;t have received the U rating.</p>
<p>The film is a rip off of Batman- a billionaire playboy who is worthmillions, I can&#x27;t remember his name, likes to build robots and sellthem to bad guys in places like Egypt. He is bored with his life andfancies a change so he turns himself into a half man half machine halfbird creature, and calls himself Iron Man. After his parents aremurdered he realises his purpose is revenge. He covers his body in thelatest weaponry- guns, lasers, big knifes, and learns to fly. After abrief training montage (running up hills, lifting cars, shootingtargets showing his skill and fitness progress) he flies to a terroristcountry and kills the bad guys. That&#x27;s about it really. Quite shallow,but some good actions and graphics. I don&#x27;t think anyone else famouswas in the movie though I was pretty drunk on whiskey while watchingit. I think it was an attempt to start a new franchise so maybe morethings will happen in the next film. The Man Of Steel will return to acinema near you next year or two! Best Scene: When Iron Man is learningto fly and he keeps zooming into the ceiling of his barn and whackinghis head. What a chump!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keithmwarwick</title>
		<link>http://www.movies-on-demand.tv/watch_iron-man-2008/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>keithmwarwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>This is a movie of three parts. The first is actually good, the secondnot so good and the third, totally abysmal. It&#039;s as if a 1970&#039;sblockbuster has undergone a superimposed makeover, complete withdigital effects, super-imposed actors and dated production values. Thatit mimics so many movies and lacks a cohesive script and dispenses withany kind of respect for the credibility factor, it shows this movie upas a total turkey. With miscast and all-at-sea acting talent thrashingaround amongst the mayhem of congealed stunts, over-the-topcontraptions and poor scripting, this movie is the Titanic of actionmovies. A lot of talent was wasted, misused and thrown away on thisleviathan of bad movie making. And that is a crying shame and afinancial meltdown!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a movie of three parts. The first is actually good, the secondnot so good and the third, totally abysmal. It&#x27;s as if a 1970&#x27;sblockbuster has undergone a superimposed makeover, complete withdigital effects, super-imposed actors and dated production values. Thatit mimics so many movies and lacks a cohesive script and dispenses withany kind of respect for the credibility factor, it shows this movie upas a total turkey. With miscast and all-at-sea acting talent thrashingaround amongst the mayhem of congealed stunts, over-the-topcontraptions and poor scripting, this movie is the Titanic of actionmovies. A lot of talent was wasted, misused and thrown away on thisleviathan of bad movie making. And that is a crying shame and afinancial meltdown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
